Journal Articles
2021
Patient-specific microdosimetry: a proof of concept Journal Article
In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2021, ISSN: 1361-6560.
@article{decunha_patient-specific_2021,
title = {Patient-specific microdosimetry: a proof of concept},
author = {Joseph M. DeCunha and Fernanda Villegas and Martin Vallières and Jose Torres and Sophie Camilleri-Broët and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/ac1d1e},
issn = {1361-6560},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-08-01},
journal = {Physics in Medicine and Biology},
abstract = {Microscopic energy deposition distributions from ionizing radiation are used to predict the biological effects of an irradiation and vary depending on biological target size. Ionizing radiation is thought to kill cells or inhibit cell cycling mainly by damaging DNA in the cell nucleus. The size of cells and nuclei depends on tissue type, cell cycle, and malignancy, all of which vary between patients. The aim of this study was to develop methods to perform patient-specific microdosimetry, that being, determining microdosimetric quantities in volumes that correspond to the sizes of cells and nuclei observed in a patient's tissue. A histopathological sample extracted from a stage I lung adenocarcinoma patient was analyzed. A pouring simulation was used to generate a three-dimensional tissue model from cell and nucleus size information determined from the histopathological sample. Microdosimetric distributions including f(y) and d(y) were determined for Co-60,Ir-192,Yb-169 and I-125 in a patient-specific model containing a distribution of cell and nucleus sizes. Fixed radius models and a summation method (where f(y) from many fixed radii models are summed) were compared to the full patient-specific model to evaluate their suitability for fast determination of patient-specific microdosimetric parameters. Fixed radius models do not provide a close approximation of the full patient-specific model y ̅_f or y ̅_d for the lower energy sources investigated, Yb-169 and I-125. The higher energy sources investigated, Co-60 and Ir-192 are less sensitive to target size variation than Yb-169 and I-125. A summation method yields the most accurate approximation of the full model d(y) for all radioisotopes investigated. A summation method allows for the computation of patient-specific microdosimetric distributions with the computing power of a personal computer. With appropriate biological inputs the microdosimetric distributions computed using these methods can yield a patient-specific relative biological effectiveness as part of a multiscale treatment planning approach.},
keywords = {Biological Effectiveness, Brachytherapy, Cellular Morphology, Microdosimetry, Patient-specific},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Microscopic energy deposition distributions from ionizing radiation are used to predict the biological effects of an irradiation and vary depending on biological target size. Ionizing radiation is thought to kill cells or inhibit cell cycling mainly by damaging DNA in the cell nucleus. The size of cells and nuclei depends on tissue type, cell cycle, and malignancy, all of which vary between patients. The aim of this study was to develop methods to perform patient-specific microdosimetry, that being, determining microdosimetric quantities in volumes that correspond to the sizes of cells and nuclei observed in a patient’s tissue. A histopathological sample extracted from a stage I lung adenocarcinoma patient was analyzed. A pouring simulation was used to generate a three-dimensional tissue model from cell and nucleus size information determined from the histopathological sample. Microdosimetric distributions including f(y) and d(y) were determined for Co-60,Ir-192,Yb-169 and I-125 in a patient-specific model containing a distribution of cell and nucleus sizes. Fixed radius models and a summation method (where f(y) from many fixed radii models are summed) were compared to the full patient-specific model to evaluate their suitability for fast determination of patient-specific microdosimetric parameters. Fixed radius models do not provide a close approximation of the full patient-specific model y ̅_f or y ̅_d for the lower energy sources investigated, Yb-169 and I-125. The higher energy sources investigated, Co-60 and Ir-192 are less sensitive to target size variation than Yb-169 and I-125. A summation method yields the most accurate approximation of the full model d(y) for all radioisotopes investigated. A summation method allows for the computation of patient-specific microdosimetric distributions with the computing power of a personal computer. With appropriate biological inputs the microdosimetric distributions computed using these methods can yield a patient-specific relative biological effectiveness as part of a multiscale treatment planning approach.Development of patient-specific 3D models from histopathological samples for applications in radiation therapy Journal Article
In: Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), vol. 81, pp. 162–169, 2021, ISSN: 1724-191X.
@article{decunha_development_2021,
title = {Development of patient-specific 3D models from histopathological samples for applications in radiation therapy},
author = {Joseph M. DeCunha and Christopher M. Poole and Martin Vallières and Jose Torres and Sophie Camilleri-Broët and Roni F. Rayes and Jonathan D. Spicer and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.009},
issn = {1724-191X},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
journal = {Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)},
volume = {81},
pages = {162--169},
abstract = {The biological effects of ionizing radiation depend on the tissue, tumor type, radiation quality, and patient-specific factors. Inter-patient variation in cell/nucleus size may influence patient-specific dose response. However, this variability in dose response is not well investigated due to lack of available cell/nucleus size data. The aim of this study was to develop methods to derive cell/nucleus size distributions from digital images of 2D histopathological samples and use them to build digital 3D models for use in cellular dosimetry. Nineteen of sixty hematoxylin and eosin stained lung adenocarcinoma samples investigated passed exclusion criterion to be analyzed in the study. A difference of gaussians blob detection algorithm was used to identify nucleus centers and quantify cell spacing. Hematoxylin content was measured to determine nucleus radius. Pouring simulations were conducted to generate one-hundred 3D models containing volumes of equivalent cell spacing and nuclei radius to those in histopathological samples. The nuclei radius distributions of non-tumoral and cancerous regions appearing in the same slide were significantly different (p textless 0.01) in all samples analyzed. The median nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio was 0.36 for non-tumoral cells and 0.50 for cancerous cells. The average cellular and nucleus packing densities in the 3D models generated were 65.9% (SD: 1.5%) and 13.3% (SD: 0.3%) respectively. Software to determine cell spacing and nuclei radius from histopathological samples was developed. 3D digital tissue models containing volumes with equivalent cell spacing, nucleus radius, and packing density to cancerous tissues were generated.},
keywords = {Algorithms, Cell Nucleus, Cellular dosimetry, Histopathology, Humans, Microdosimetry, Patient-specific, Radiometry},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The biological effects of ionizing radiation depend on the tissue, tumor type, radiation quality, and patient-specific factors. Inter-patient variation in cell/nucleus size may influence patient-specific dose response. However, this variability in dose response is not well investigated due to lack of available cell/nucleus size data. The aim of this study was to develop methods to derive cell/nucleus size distributions from digital images of 2D histopathological samples and use them to build digital 3D models for use in cellular dosimetry. Nineteen of sixty hematoxylin and eosin stained lung adenocarcinoma samples investigated passed exclusion criterion to be analyzed in the study. A difference of gaussians blob detection algorithm was used to identify nucleus centers and quantify cell spacing. Hematoxylin content was measured to determine nucleus radius. Pouring simulations were conducted to generate one-hundred 3D models containing volumes of equivalent cell spacing and nuclei radius to those in histopathological samples. The nuclei radius distributions of non-tumoral and cancerous regions appearing in the same slide were significantly different (p textless 0.01) in all samples analyzed. The median nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio was 0.36 for non-tumoral cells and 0.50 for cancerous cells. The average cellular and nucleus packing densities in the 3D models generated were 65.9% (SD: 1.5%) and 13.3% (SD: 0.3%) respectively. Software to determine cell spacing and nuclei radius from histopathological samples was developed. 3D digital tissue models containing volumes with equivalent cell spacing, nucleus radius, and packing density to cancerous tissues were generated.
Journal Articles
2021
Patient-specific microdosimetry: a proof of concept Journal Article
In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2021, ISSN: 1361-6560.
@article{decunha_patient-specific_2021,
title = {Patient-specific microdosimetry: a proof of concept},
author = {Joseph M. DeCunha and Fernanda Villegas and Martin Vallières and Jose Torres and Sophie Camilleri-Broët and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/ac1d1e},
issn = {1361-6560},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-08-01},
journal = {Physics in Medicine and Biology},
abstract = {Microscopic energy deposition distributions from ionizing radiation are used to predict the biological effects of an irradiation and vary depending on biological target size. Ionizing radiation is thought to kill cells or inhibit cell cycling mainly by damaging DNA in the cell nucleus. The size of cells and nuclei depends on tissue type, cell cycle, and malignancy, all of which vary between patients. The aim of this study was to develop methods to perform patient-specific microdosimetry, that being, determining microdosimetric quantities in volumes that correspond to the sizes of cells and nuclei observed in a patient's tissue. A histopathological sample extracted from a stage I lung adenocarcinoma patient was analyzed. A pouring simulation was used to generate a three-dimensional tissue model from cell and nucleus size information determined from the histopathological sample. Microdosimetric distributions including f(y) and d(y) were determined for Co-60,Ir-192,Yb-169 and I-125 in a patient-specific model containing a distribution of cell and nucleus sizes. Fixed radius models and a summation method (where f(y) from many fixed radii models are summed) were compared to the full patient-specific model to evaluate their suitability for fast determination of patient-specific microdosimetric parameters. Fixed radius models do not provide a close approximation of the full patient-specific model y ̅_f or y ̅_d for the lower energy sources investigated, Yb-169 and I-125. The higher energy sources investigated, Co-60 and Ir-192 are less sensitive to target size variation than Yb-169 and I-125. A summation method yields the most accurate approximation of the full model d(y) for all radioisotopes investigated. A summation method allows for the computation of patient-specific microdosimetric distributions with the computing power of a personal computer. With appropriate biological inputs the microdosimetric distributions computed using these methods can yield a patient-specific relative biological effectiveness as part of a multiscale treatment planning approach.},
keywords = {Biological Effectiveness, Brachytherapy, Cellular Morphology, Microdosimetry, Patient-specific},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Microscopic energy deposition distributions from ionizing radiation are used to predict the biological effects of an irradiation and vary depending on biological target size. Ionizing radiation is thought to kill cells or inhibit cell cycling mainly by damaging DNA in the cell nucleus. The size of cells and nuclei depends on tissue type, cell cycle, and malignancy, all of which vary between patients. The aim of this study was to develop methods to perform patient-specific microdosimetry, that being, determining microdosimetric quantities in volumes that correspond to the sizes of cells and nuclei observed in a patient’s tissue. A histopathological sample extracted from a stage I lung adenocarcinoma patient was analyzed. A pouring simulation was used to generate a three-dimensional tissue model from cell and nucleus size information determined from the histopathological sample. Microdosimetric distributions including f(y) and d(y) were determined for Co-60,Ir-192,Yb-169 and I-125 in a patient-specific model containing a distribution of cell and nucleus sizes. Fixed radius models and a summation method (where f(y) from many fixed radii models are summed) were compared to the full patient-specific model to evaluate their suitability for fast determination of patient-specific microdosimetric parameters. Fixed radius models do not provide a close approximation of the full patient-specific model y ̅_f or y ̅_d for the lower energy sources investigated, Yb-169 and I-125. The higher energy sources investigated, Co-60 and Ir-192 are less sensitive to target size variation than Yb-169 and I-125. A summation method yields the most accurate approximation of the full model d(y) for all radioisotopes investigated. A summation method allows for the computation of patient-specific microdosimetric distributions with the computing power of a personal computer. With appropriate biological inputs the microdosimetric distributions computed using these methods can yield a patient-specific relative biological effectiveness as part of a multiscale treatment planning approach.
Development of patient-specific 3D models from histopathological samples for applications in radiation therapy Journal Article
In: Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), vol. 81, pp. 162–169, 2021, ISSN: 1724-191X.
@article{decunha_development_2021,
title = {Development of patient-specific 3D models from histopathological samples for applications in radiation therapy},
author = {Joseph M. DeCunha and Christopher M. Poole and Martin Vallières and Jose Torres and Sophie Camilleri-Broët and Roni F. Rayes and Jonathan D. Spicer and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.009},
issn = {1724-191X},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
journal = {Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)},
volume = {81},
pages = {162--169},
abstract = {The biological effects of ionizing radiation depend on the tissue, tumor type, radiation quality, and patient-specific factors. Inter-patient variation in cell/nucleus size may influence patient-specific dose response. However, this variability in dose response is not well investigated due to lack of available cell/nucleus size data. The aim of this study was to develop methods to derive cell/nucleus size distributions from digital images of 2D histopathological samples and use them to build digital 3D models for use in cellular dosimetry. Nineteen of sixty hematoxylin and eosin stained lung adenocarcinoma samples investigated passed exclusion criterion to be analyzed in the study. A difference of gaussians blob detection algorithm was used to identify nucleus centers and quantify cell spacing. Hematoxylin content was measured to determine nucleus radius. Pouring simulations were conducted to generate one-hundred 3D models containing volumes of equivalent cell spacing and nuclei radius to those in histopathological samples. The nuclei radius distributions of non-tumoral and cancerous regions appearing in the same slide were significantly different (p textless 0.01) in all samples analyzed. The median nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio was 0.36 for non-tumoral cells and 0.50 for cancerous cells. The average cellular and nucleus packing densities in the 3D models generated were 65.9% (SD: 1.5%) and 13.3% (SD: 0.3%) respectively. Software to determine cell spacing and nuclei radius from histopathological samples was developed. 3D digital tissue models containing volumes with equivalent cell spacing, nucleus radius, and packing density to cancerous tissues were generated.},
keywords = {Algorithms, Cell Nucleus, Cellular dosimetry, Histopathology, Humans, Microdosimetry, Patient-specific, Radiometry},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The biological effects of ionizing radiation depend on the tissue, tumor type, radiation quality, and patient-specific factors. Inter-patient variation in cell/nucleus size may influence patient-specific dose response. However, this variability in dose response is not well investigated due to lack of available cell/nucleus size data. The aim of this study was to develop methods to derive cell/nucleus size distributions from digital images of 2D histopathological samples and use them to build digital 3D models for use in cellular dosimetry. Nineteen of sixty hematoxylin and eosin stained lung adenocarcinoma samples investigated passed exclusion criterion to be analyzed in the study. A difference of gaussians blob detection algorithm was used to identify nucleus centers and quantify cell spacing. Hematoxylin content was measured to determine nucleus radius. Pouring simulations were conducted to generate one-hundred 3D models containing volumes of equivalent cell spacing and nuclei radius to those in histopathological samples. The nuclei radius distributions of non-tumoral and cancerous regions appearing in the same slide were significantly different (p textless 0.01) in all samples analyzed. The median nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio was 0.36 for non-tumoral cells and 0.50 for cancerous cells. The average cellular and nucleus packing densities in the 3D models generated were 65.9% (SD: 1.5%) and 13.3% (SD: 0.3%) respectively. Software to determine cell spacing and nuclei radius from histopathological samples was developed. 3D digital tissue models containing volumes with equivalent cell spacing, nucleus radius, and packing density to cancerous tissues were generated.