Journal Articles
2020
Famulari, Gabriel; Alfieri, Joanne; Duclos, Marie; Vuong, Té; Enger, Shirin A.
Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Journal Article
In: Brachytherapy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–263, 2020, ISSN: 1873-1449.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_can_2020,
title = {Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy?},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Joanne Alfieri and Marie Duclos and Té Vuong and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.brachy.2019.12.004},
issn = {1873-1449},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Brachytherapy},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {255--263},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.},
keywords = {Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.2012
Enger, Shirin A.; Lundqvist, Hans; D’Amours, Michel; Beaulieu, Luc
Exploring (57)Co as a new isotope for brachytherapy applications Journal Article
In: Medical Physics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2342–2345, 2012, ISSN: 0094-2405.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Radiation, Radiometry, Scattering
@article{enger_exploring_2012,
title = {Exploring (57)Co as a new isotope for brachytherapy applications},
author = {Shirin A. Enger and Hans Lundqvist and Michel D'Amours and Luc Beaulieu},
doi = {10.1118/1.3700171},
issn = {0094-2405},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
journal = {Medical Physics},
volume = {39},
number = {5},
pages = {2342--2345},
abstract = {PURPOSE: The characteristics of the radionuclide (57)Co make it interesting for use as a brachytherapy source. (57)Co combines a possible high specific activity with the emission of relatively low-energy photons and a half-life (272 days) suitable for regular source exchanges in an afterloader. (57)Co decays by electron capture to the stable (57)Fe with emission of 136 and 122 keV photons.
METHODS: A hypothetical (57)Co source based on the Flexisource brachytherapy encapsulation with the active core set as a pure cobalt cylinder (length 3.5 mm and diameter 0.6 mm) covered with a cylindrical stainless-steel capsule (length 5 mm and thickness 0.125 mm) was simulated using Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) code version 9.4. The radial dose function, g(r), and anisotropy function F(r,θ), for the line source approximation were calculated following the TG-43U1 formalism. The results were compared to well-known (192)Ir and (125)I radionuclides, representing the higher and the lower energy end of brachytherapy, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean energy of photons in water, after passing through the core and the encapsulation material was 123 keV. This hypothetical (57)Co source has an increasing g(r) due to multiple scatter of low-energy photons, which results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir.
CONCLUSIONS: (57)Co has many advantages compared to (192)Ir due to its low-energy gamma emissions without any electron contamination. (57)Co has an increasing g(r) that results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir due to its multiple scattered photons. The anisotropy of the (57)Co source is comparable to that of (192)Ir. Furthermore, (57)Co has lower shielding requirements than (192)Ir.},
keywords = {Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Radiation, Radiometry, Scattering},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: The characteristics of the radionuclide (57)Co make it interesting for use as a brachytherapy source. (57)Co combines a possible high specific activity with the emission of relatively low-energy photons and a half-life (272 days) suitable for regular source exchanges in an afterloader. (57)Co decays by electron capture to the stable (57)Fe with emission of 136 and 122 keV photons.
METHODS: A hypothetical (57)Co source based on the Flexisource brachytherapy encapsulation with the active core set as a pure cobalt cylinder (length 3.5 mm and diameter 0.6 mm) covered with a cylindrical stainless-steel capsule (length 5 mm and thickness 0.125 mm) was simulated using Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) code version 9.4. The radial dose function, g(r), and anisotropy function F(r,θ), for the line source approximation were calculated following the TG-43U1 formalism. The results were compared to well-known (192)Ir and (125)I radionuclides, representing the higher and the lower energy end of brachytherapy, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean energy of photons in water, after passing through the core and the encapsulation material was 123 keV. This hypothetical (57)Co source has an increasing g(r) due to multiple scatter of low-energy photons, which results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir.
CONCLUSIONS: (57)Co has many advantages compared to (192)Ir due to its low-energy gamma emissions without any electron contamination. (57)Co has an increasing g(r) that results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir due to its multiple scattered photons. The anisotropy of the (57)Co source is comparable to that of (192)Ir. Furthermore, (57)Co has lower shielding requirements than (192)Ir.
Journal Articles
2020
Famulari, Gabriel; Alfieri, Joanne; Duclos, Marie; Vuong, Té; Enger, Shirin A.
Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Journal Article
In: Brachytherapy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–263, 2020, ISSN: 1873-1449.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_can_2020,
title = {Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy?},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Joanne Alfieri and Marie Duclos and Té Vuong and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.brachy.2019.12.004},
issn = {1873-1449},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Brachytherapy},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {255--263},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.},
keywords = {Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.
2012
Enger, Shirin A.; Lundqvist, Hans; D’Amours, Michel; Beaulieu, Luc
Exploring (57)Co as a new isotope for brachytherapy applications Journal Article
In: Medical Physics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2342–2345, 2012, ISSN: 0094-2405.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Radiation, Radiometry, Scattering
@article{enger_exploring_2012,
title = {Exploring (57)Co as a new isotope for brachytherapy applications},
author = {Shirin A. Enger and Hans Lundqvist and Michel D'Amours and Luc Beaulieu},
doi = {10.1118/1.3700171},
issn = {0094-2405},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
journal = {Medical Physics},
volume = {39},
number = {5},
pages = {2342--2345},
abstract = {PURPOSE: The characteristics of the radionuclide (57)Co make it interesting for use as a brachytherapy source. (57)Co combines a possible high specific activity with the emission of relatively low-energy photons and a half-life (272 days) suitable for regular source exchanges in an afterloader. (57)Co decays by electron capture to the stable (57)Fe with emission of 136 and 122 keV photons.
METHODS: A hypothetical (57)Co source based on the Flexisource brachytherapy encapsulation with the active core set as a pure cobalt cylinder (length 3.5 mm and diameter 0.6 mm) covered with a cylindrical stainless-steel capsule (length 5 mm and thickness 0.125 mm) was simulated using Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) code version 9.4. The radial dose function, g(r), and anisotropy function F(r,θ), for the line source approximation were calculated following the TG-43U1 formalism. The results were compared to well-known (192)Ir and (125)I radionuclides, representing the higher and the lower energy end of brachytherapy, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean energy of photons in water, after passing through the core and the encapsulation material was 123 keV. This hypothetical (57)Co source has an increasing g(r) due to multiple scatter of low-energy photons, which results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir.
CONCLUSIONS: (57)Co has many advantages compared to (192)Ir due to its low-energy gamma emissions without any electron contamination. (57)Co has an increasing g(r) that results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir due to its multiple scattered photons. The anisotropy of the (57)Co source is comparable to that of (192)Ir. Furthermore, (57)Co has lower shielding requirements than (192)Ir.},
keywords = {Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Radiation, Radiometry, Scattering},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: The characteristics of the radionuclide (57)Co make it interesting for use as a brachytherapy source. (57)Co combines a possible high specific activity with the emission of relatively low-energy photons and a half-life (272 days) suitable for regular source exchanges in an afterloader. (57)Co decays by electron capture to the stable (57)Fe with emission of 136 and 122 keV photons.
METHODS: A hypothetical (57)Co source based on the Flexisource brachytherapy encapsulation with the active core set as a pure cobalt cylinder (length 3.5 mm and diameter 0.6 mm) covered with a cylindrical stainless-steel capsule (length 5 mm and thickness 0.125 mm) was simulated using Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) code version 9.4. The radial dose function, g(r), and anisotropy function F(r,θ), for the line source approximation were calculated following the TG-43U1 formalism. The results were compared to well-known (192)Ir and (125)I radionuclides, representing the higher and the lower energy end of brachytherapy, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean energy of photons in water, after passing through the core and the encapsulation material was 123 keV. This hypothetical (57)Co source has an increasing g(r) due to multiple scatter of low-energy photons, which results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir.
CONCLUSIONS: (57)Co has many advantages compared to (192)Ir due to its low-energy gamma emissions without any electron contamination. (57)Co has an increasing g(r) that results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir due to its multiple scattered photons. The anisotropy of the (57)Co source is comparable to that of (192)Ir. Furthermore, (57)Co has lower shielding requirements than (192)Ir.
METHODS: A hypothetical (57)Co source based on the Flexisource brachytherapy encapsulation with the active core set as a pure cobalt cylinder (length 3.5 mm and diameter 0.6 mm) covered with a cylindrical stainless-steel capsule (length 5 mm and thickness 0.125 mm) was simulated using Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) code version 9.4. The radial dose function, g(r), and anisotropy function F(r,θ), for the line source approximation were calculated following the TG-43U1 formalism. The results were compared to well-known (192)Ir and (125)I radionuclides, representing the higher and the lower energy end of brachytherapy, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean energy of photons in water, after passing through the core and the encapsulation material was 123 keV. This hypothetical (57)Co source has an increasing g(r) due to multiple scatter of low-energy photons, which results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir.
CONCLUSIONS: (57)Co has many advantages compared to (192)Ir due to its low-energy gamma emissions without any electron contamination. (57)Co has an increasing g(r) that results in a more uniform dose distribution than (192)Ir due to its multiple scattered photons. The anisotropy of the (57)Co source is comparable to that of (192)Ir. Furthermore, (57)Co has lower shielding requirements than (192)Ir.