Journal Articles
2020
Famulari, Gabriel; Alfieri, Joanne; Duclos, Marie; Vuong, Té; Enger, Shirin A.
Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Journal Article
In: Brachytherapy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–263, 2020, ISSN: 1873-1449.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_can_2020,
title = {Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy?},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Joanne Alfieri and Marie Duclos and Té Vuong and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.brachy.2019.12.004},
issn = {1873-1449},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Brachytherapy},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {255--263},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.},
keywords = {Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor. Morcos, Marc; Enger, Shirin A.
Monte Carlo dosimetry study of novel rotating MRI-compatible shielded tandems for intensity modulated cervix brachytherapy Journal Article
In: Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), vol. 71, pp. 178–184, 2020, ISSN: 1724-191X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Iridium Radioisotopes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy, Selenium Radioisotopes, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Ytterbium
@article{morcos_monte_2020,
title = {Monte Carlo dosimetry study of novel rotating MRI-compatible shielded tandems for intensity modulated cervix brachytherapy},
author = {Marc Morcos and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.014},
issn = {1724-191X},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-03-01},
journal = {Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)},
volume = {71},
pages = {178--184},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) with rotating metal shields enables dose modulation that can better conform to the tumor while reducing OAR doses. In this work, we investigate novel rotating shields, compatible with MRI-compatible tandems used for cervix brachytherapy. Three unique shields were evaluated using the traditional 192Ir source. Additionally, 75Se and 169Yb isotopes were investigated as alternative sources.
METHODS: Three different IMBT shields were modeled and simulated in RapidBrachyMCTPS. Each tungsten shield was designed to fit inside a 6 mm-wide MRI-compatible tandem. The active core of the source was replaced with 192Ir, 75Se and 169Yb. Transmission factors (TFs) were calculated and defined as the dose ratio at 1 cm on opposite sides of the shielded tandem on the transverse plane. Polar and azimuthal anisotropy plots were extracted from simulations. Dose homogeneities V200%V100% were calculated for all radionuclide-shield combinations.
RESULTS: TFs are favorable for IMBT and ranged between 12.9% and 32.2% for 192Ir, 4.0%-16.1% for 75Se and 1.2-6.4% for 169Yb for all shield designs. Average beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal directions were reduced to the range of 42°-112° and 27°-107°, respectively, for all shield-radionuclide combinations. Dose homogeneities for all the radionuclide-shield combinations were within 12% of the non-IMBT tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has quantitatively assessed the influence of various rotating cervical cancer-specific IMBT tandem shields on dosimetry. The dynamic single-channel shields and narrow beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal direction give rise to highly anisotropic distributions. Intermediate-to-high energy radionuclides, 75Se and 169Yb substantially improve the modulation capacity of IMBT and pave the way for treating large and complex cervical cancer without interstitial needle implantation.},
keywords = {Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Iridium Radioisotopes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy, Selenium Radioisotopes, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) with rotating metal shields enables dose modulation that can better conform to the tumor while reducing OAR doses. In this work, we investigate novel rotating shields, compatible with MRI-compatible tandems used for cervix brachytherapy. Three unique shields were evaluated using the traditional 192Ir source. Additionally, 75Se and 169Yb isotopes were investigated as alternative sources.
METHODS: Three different IMBT shields were modeled and simulated in RapidBrachyMCTPS. Each tungsten shield was designed to fit inside a 6 mm-wide MRI-compatible tandem. The active core of the source was replaced with 192Ir, 75Se and 169Yb. Transmission factors (TFs) were calculated and defined as the dose ratio at 1 cm on opposite sides of the shielded tandem on the transverse plane. Polar and azimuthal anisotropy plots were extracted from simulations. Dose homogeneities V200%V100% were calculated for all radionuclide-shield combinations.
RESULTS: TFs are favorable for IMBT and ranged between 12.9% and 32.2% for 192Ir, 4.0%-16.1% for 75Se and 1.2-6.4% for 169Yb for all shield designs. Average beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal directions were reduced to the range of 42°-112° and 27°-107°, respectively, for all shield-radionuclide combinations. Dose homogeneities for all the radionuclide-shield combinations were within 12% of the non-IMBT tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has quantitatively assessed the influence of various rotating cervical cancer-specific IMBT tandem shields on dosimetry. The dynamic single-channel shields and narrow beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal direction give rise to highly anisotropic distributions. Intermediate-to-high energy radionuclides, 75Se and 169Yb substantially improve the modulation capacity of IMBT and pave the way for treating large and complex cervical cancer without interstitial needle implantation.2019
Shoemaker, Tristan; Vuong, Té; Glickman, Harry; Kaifi, Samar; Famulari, Gabriel; Enger, Shirin A.
Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 875–883, 2019, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium
@article{shoemaker_dosimetric_2019,
title = {Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy},
author = {Tristan Shoemaker and Té Vuong and Harry Glickman and Samar Kaifi and Gabriel Famulari and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.003},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-11-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {105},
number = {4},
pages = {875--883},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.2018
Famulari, Gabriel; Pater, Piotr; Enger, Shirin A.
Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 270–277, 2018, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_microdosimetric_2018,
title = {Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Piotr Pater and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.040},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {100},
number = {1},
pages = {270--277},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.
Journal Articles
2020
Famulari, Gabriel; Alfieri, Joanne; Duclos, Marie; Vuong, Té; Enger, Shirin A.
Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Journal Article
In: Brachytherapy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–263, 2020, ISSN: 1873-1449.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_can_2020,
title = {Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy?},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Joanne Alfieri and Marie Duclos and Té Vuong and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.brachy.2019.12.004},
issn = {1873-1449},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Brachytherapy},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {255--263},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.},
keywords = {Bone and Bones, Brachytherapy, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Dose calculation, Gadolinium, Humans, Intermediate-energy source, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tissue composition, Tongue Neoplasms, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m).
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.
RESULTS: Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%-2% for prostate and 4%-7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant (textless5%) for soft tissues in general. Going from Dw,w to Dm,m, bone doses were increased two- to three-fold for 169Yb and four- to five-fold for 153Gd, whereas the ratio was close to ∼1 for high-energy sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.
Morcos, Marc; Enger, Shirin A.
Monte Carlo dosimetry study of novel rotating MRI-compatible shielded tandems for intensity modulated cervix brachytherapy Journal Article
In: Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), vol. 71, pp. 178–184, 2020, ISSN: 1724-191X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Iridium Radioisotopes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy, Selenium Radioisotopes, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Ytterbium
@article{morcos_monte_2020,
title = {Monte Carlo dosimetry study of novel rotating MRI-compatible shielded tandems for intensity modulated cervix brachytherapy},
author = {Marc Morcos and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.014},
issn = {1724-191X},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-03-01},
journal = {Physica medica: PM: an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology: official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)},
volume = {71},
pages = {178--184},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) with rotating metal shields enables dose modulation that can better conform to the tumor while reducing OAR doses. In this work, we investigate novel rotating shields, compatible with MRI-compatible tandems used for cervix brachytherapy. Three unique shields were evaluated using the traditional 192Ir source. Additionally, 75Se and 169Yb isotopes were investigated as alternative sources.
METHODS: Three different IMBT shields were modeled and simulated in RapidBrachyMCTPS. Each tungsten shield was designed to fit inside a 6 mm-wide MRI-compatible tandem. The active core of the source was replaced with 192Ir, 75Se and 169Yb. Transmission factors (TFs) were calculated and defined as the dose ratio at 1 cm on opposite sides of the shielded tandem on the transverse plane. Polar and azimuthal anisotropy plots were extracted from simulations. Dose homogeneities V200%V100% were calculated for all radionuclide-shield combinations.
RESULTS: TFs are favorable for IMBT and ranged between 12.9% and 32.2% for 192Ir, 4.0%-16.1% for 75Se and 1.2-6.4% for 169Yb for all shield designs. Average beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal directions were reduced to the range of 42°-112° and 27°-107°, respectively, for all shield-radionuclide combinations. Dose homogeneities for all the radionuclide-shield combinations were within 12% of the non-IMBT tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has quantitatively assessed the influence of various rotating cervical cancer-specific IMBT tandem shields on dosimetry. The dynamic single-channel shields and narrow beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal direction give rise to highly anisotropic distributions. Intermediate-to-high energy radionuclides, 75Se and 169Yb substantially improve the modulation capacity of IMBT and pave the way for treating large and complex cervical cancer without interstitial needle implantation.},
keywords = {Anisotropy, Brachytherapy, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Iridium Radioisotopes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy, Selenium Radioisotopes, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) with rotating metal shields enables dose modulation that can better conform to the tumor while reducing OAR doses. In this work, we investigate novel rotating shields, compatible with MRI-compatible tandems used for cervix brachytherapy. Three unique shields were evaluated using the traditional 192Ir source. Additionally, 75Se and 169Yb isotopes were investigated as alternative sources.
METHODS: Three different IMBT shields were modeled and simulated in RapidBrachyMCTPS. Each tungsten shield was designed to fit inside a 6 mm-wide MRI-compatible tandem. The active core of the source was replaced with 192Ir, 75Se and 169Yb. Transmission factors (TFs) were calculated and defined as the dose ratio at 1 cm on opposite sides of the shielded tandem on the transverse plane. Polar and azimuthal anisotropy plots were extracted from simulations. Dose homogeneities V200%V100% were calculated for all radionuclide-shield combinations.
RESULTS: TFs are favorable for IMBT and ranged between 12.9% and 32.2% for 192Ir, 4.0%-16.1% for 75Se and 1.2-6.4% for 169Yb for all shield designs. Average beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal directions were reduced to the range of 42°-112° and 27°-107°, respectively, for all shield-radionuclide combinations. Dose homogeneities for all the radionuclide-shield combinations were within 12% of the non-IMBT tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has quantitatively assessed the influence of various rotating cervical cancer-specific IMBT tandem shields on dosimetry. The dynamic single-channel shields and narrow beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal direction give rise to highly anisotropic distributions. Intermediate-to-high energy radionuclides, 75Se and 169Yb substantially improve the modulation capacity of IMBT and pave the way for treating large and complex cervical cancer without interstitial needle implantation.
METHODS: Three different IMBT shields were modeled and simulated in RapidBrachyMCTPS. Each tungsten shield was designed to fit inside a 6 mm-wide MRI-compatible tandem. The active core of the source was replaced with 192Ir, 75Se and 169Yb. Transmission factors (TFs) were calculated and defined as the dose ratio at 1 cm on opposite sides of the shielded tandem on the transverse plane. Polar and azimuthal anisotropy plots were extracted from simulations. Dose homogeneities V200%V100% were calculated for all radionuclide-shield combinations.
RESULTS: TFs are favorable for IMBT and ranged between 12.9% and 32.2% for 192Ir, 4.0%-16.1% for 75Se and 1.2-6.4% for 169Yb for all shield designs. Average beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal directions were reduced to the range of 42°-112° and 27°-107°, respectively, for all shield-radionuclide combinations. Dose homogeneities for all the radionuclide-shield combinations were within 12% of the non-IMBT tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has quantitatively assessed the influence of various rotating cervical cancer-specific IMBT tandem shields on dosimetry. The dynamic single-channel shields and narrow beam-widths in the polar and azimuthal direction give rise to highly anisotropic distributions. Intermediate-to-high energy radionuclides, 75Se and 169Yb substantially improve the modulation capacity of IMBT and pave the way for treating large and complex cervical cancer without interstitial needle implantation.
2019
Shoemaker, Tristan; Vuong, Té; Glickman, Harry; Kaifi, Samar; Famulari, Gabriel; Enger, Shirin A.
Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 875–883, 2019, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium
@article{shoemaker_dosimetric_2019,
title = {Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy},
author = {Tristan Shoemaker and Té Vuong and Harry Glickman and Samar Kaifi and Gabriel Famulari and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.003},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-11-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {105},
number = {4},
pages = {875--883},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.
2018
Famulari, Gabriel; Pater, Piotr; Enger, Shirin A.
Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 270–277, 2018, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_microdosimetric_2018,
title = {Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Piotr Pater and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.040},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {100},
number = {1},
pages = {270--277},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.