Journal Articles
2018
Famulari, Gabriel; Pater, Piotr; Enger, Shirin A.
Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 270–277, 2018, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_microdosimetric_2018,
title = {Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Piotr Pater and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.040},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {100},
number = {1},
pages = {270--277},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.2006
Enger, Shirin A.; Rezaei, Arash; af Rosenschöld, Per Munck; Lundqvist, Hans
Gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB), a new treatment method for intravascular brachytherapy Journal Article
In: Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2006, ISSN: 0094-2405.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Biological, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Brachytherapy, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Gadolinium, Graft Occlusion, Humans, Models, Monte Carlo Method, Neutron Capture Therapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Statistical, Stents, Vascular
@article{enger_gadolinium_2006,
title = {Gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB), a new treatment method for intravascular brachytherapy},
author = {Shirin A. Enger and Arash Rezaei and Per Munck af Rosenschöld and Hans Lundqvist},
doi = {10.1118/1.2146050},
issn = {0094-2405},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Medical Physics},
volume = {33},
number = {1},
pages = {46--51},
abstract = {Restenosis is a major problem after balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. The aim of this study is to introduce gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB) as a suitable modality for treatment of stenosis. The utility of GdNCB in intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) of stent stenosis is investigated by using the GEANT4 and MCNP4B Monte Carlo radiation transport codes. To study capture rate, Kerma, absorbed dose and absorbed dose rate around a Gd-containing stent activated with neutrons, a 30 mm long, 5 mm diameter gadolinium foil is chosen. The input data is a neutron spectrum used for clinical neutron capture therapy in Studsvik, Sweden. Thermal neutron capture in gadolinium yields a spectrum of high-energy gamma photons, which due to the build-up effect gives an almost flat dose delivery pattern to the first 4 mm around the stent. The absorbed dose rate is 1.33 Gy/min, 0.25 mm from the stent surface while the dose to normal tissue is in order of 0.22 Gy/min, i.e., a factor of 6 lower. To spare normal tissue further fractionation of the dose is also possible. The capture rate is relatively high at both ends of the foil. The dose distribution from gamma and charge particle radiation at the edges and inside the stent contributes to a nonuniform dose distribution. This will lead to higher doses to the surrounding tissue and may prevent stent edge and in-stent restenosis. The position of the stent can be verified and corrected by the treatment plan prior to activation. Activation of the stent by an external neutron field can be performed days after catherization when the target cells start to proliferate and can be expected to be more radiation sensitive. Another advantage of the nonradioactive gadolinium stent is the possibility to avoid radiation hazard to personnel.},
keywords = {Biological, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Brachytherapy, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Gadolinium, Graft Occlusion, Humans, Models, Monte Carlo Method, Neutron Capture Therapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Statistical, Stents, Vascular},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Restenosis is a major problem after balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. The aim of this study is to introduce gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB) as a suitable modality for treatment of stenosis. The utility of GdNCB in intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) of stent stenosis is investigated by using the GEANT4 and MCNP4B Monte Carlo radiation transport codes. To study capture rate, Kerma, absorbed dose and absorbed dose rate around a Gd-containing stent activated with neutrons, a 30 mm long, 5 mm diameter gadolinium foil is chosen. The input data is a neutron spectrum used for clinical neutron capture therapy in Studsvik, Sweden. Thermal neutron capture in gadolinium yields a spectrum of high-energy gamma photons, which due to the build-up effect gives an almost flat dose delivery pattern to the first 4 mm around the stent. The absorbed dose rate is 1.33 Gy/min, 0.25 mm from the stent surface while the dose to normal tissue is in order of 0.22 Gy/min, i.e., a factor of 6 lower. To spare normal tissue further fractionation of the dose is also possible. The capture rate is relatively high at both ends of the foil. The dose distribution from gamma and charge particle radiation at the edges and inside the stent contributes to a nonuniform dose distribution. This will lead to higher doses to the surrounding tissue and may prevent stent edge and in-stent restenosis. The position of the stent can be verified and corrected by the treatment plan prior to activation. Activation of the stent by an external neutron field can be performed days after catherization when the target cells start to proliferate and can be expected to be more radiation sensitive. Another advantage of the nonradioactive gadolinium stent is the possibility to avoid radiation hazard to personnel.
Journal Articles
2018
Famulari, Gabriel; Pater, Piotr; Enger, Shirin A.
Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 270–277, 2018, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium
@article{famulari_microdosimetric_2018,
title = {Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study},
author = {Gabriel Famulari and Piotr Pater and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.040},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {100},
number = {1},
pages = {270--277},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Gadolinium, Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Iridium Radioisotopes, Linear Energy Transfer, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Selenium Radioisotopes, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Radioisotopes such as 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd have photon energy spectra and half-lives that make them excellent candidates as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of current (192Ir, 125I, 103Pd) and alternative (75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd) brachytherapy radionuclides using Monte Carlo simulations of lineal energy distributions.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v2 [192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd], SelectSeed [125I], and TheraSeed [103Pd]) were placed in the center of a spherical water phantom with a radius of 40 cm using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The kinetic energy of all primary, scattered, and fluorescence photons interacting in a scoring volume were tallied at various depths from the source. Electron tracks were generated by sampling the photon interaction spectrum and tracking all the interactions down to 10 eV using the event-by-event capabilities of the Geant4-DNA models. The dose mean lineal energy (y¯D) values were obtained through random sampling of transfer points and overlaying spherical scoring volumes within the associated volume of the tracks. The scoring volume diameter was determined by fitting the y¯D ratio for 125I to its observed RBE.
RESULTS: y¯D increased with the increasing distance from the source for 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb, remained constant for 153Gd and 125I, and decreased for 103Pd. The diameter at which the y¯D ratio coincided with the RBE of 1.15 to 1.20 for 125I was ∼25 to 40 nm. The RBE (reference 1 MeV photons) at high doses and dose rates for 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, 153Gd, 125I, and 103Pd was 1.028 to 1.034, 1.05 to 1.07, 1.12 to 1.15, 1.16 to 1.21, 1.15 to 1.20, and 1.17 to 1.22, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation quality of the radionuclides under investigation was greater than that of high-energy photons. The present study has provided a set of values to modify the prescription doses for brachytherapy to account for the variation in radiation quality among radionuclides.
2006
Enger, Shirin A.; Rezaei, Arash; af Rosenschöld, Per Munck; Lundqvist, Hans
Gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB), a new treatment method for intravascular brachytherapy Journal Article
In: Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2006, ISSN: 0094-2405.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Biological, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Brachytherapy, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Gadolinium, Graft Occlusion, Humans, Models, Monte Carlo Method, Neutron Capture Therapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Statistical, Stents, Vascular
@article{enger_gadolinium_2006,
title = {Gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB), a new treatment method for intravascular brachytherapy},
author = {Shirin A. Enger and Arash Rezaei and Per Munck af Rosenschöld and Hans Lundqvist},
doi = {10.1118/1.2146050},
issn = {0094-2405},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Medical Physics},
volume = {33},
number = {1},
pages = {46--51},
abstract = {Restenosis is a major problem after balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. The aim of this study is to introduce gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB) as a suitable modality for treatment of stenosis. The utility of GdNCB in intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) of stent stenosis is investigated by using the GEANT4 and MCNP4B Monte Carlo radiation transport codes. To study capture rate, Kerma, absorbed dose and absorbed dose rate around a Gd-containing stent activated with neutrons, a 30 mm long, 5 mm diameter gadolinium foil is chosen. The input data is a neutron spectrum used for clinical neutron capture therapy in Studsvik, Sweden. Thermal neutron capture in gadolinium yields a spectrum of high-energy gamma photons, which due to the build-up effect gives an almost flat dose delivery pattern to the first 4 mm around the stent. The absorbed dose rate is 1.33 Gy/min, 0.25 mm from the stent surface while the dose to normal tissue is in order of 0.22 Gy/min, i.e., a factor of 6 lower. To spare normal tissue further fractionation of the dose is also possible. The capture rate is relatively high at both ends of the foil. The dose distribution from gamma and charge particle radiation at the edges and inside the stent contributes to a nonuniform dose distribution. This will lead to higher doses to the surrounding tissue and may prevent stent edge and in-stent restenosis. The position of the stent can be verified and corrected by the treatment plan prior to activation. Activation of the stent by an external neutron field can be performed days after catherization when the target cells start to proliferate and can be expected to be more radiation sensitive. Another advantage of the nonradioactive gadolinium stent is the possibility to avoid radiation hazard to personnel.},
keywords = {Biological, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Brachytherapy, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted, Gadolinium, Graft Occlusion, Humans, Models, Monte Carlo Method, Neutron Capture Therapy, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Statistical, Stents, Vascular},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Restenosis is a major problem after balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. The aim of this study is to introduce gadolinium neutron capture brachytherapy (GdNCB) as a suitable modality for treatment of stenosis. The utility of GdNCB in intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) of stent stenosis is investigated by using the GEANT4 and MCNP4B Monte Carlo radiation transport codes. To study capture rate, Kerma, absorbed dose and absorbed dose rate around a Gd-containing stent activated with neutrons, a 30 mm long, 5 mm diameter gadolinium foil is chosen. The input data is a neutron spectrum used for clinical neutron capture therapy in Studsvik, Sweden. Thermal neutron capture in gadolinium yields a spectrum of high-energy gamma photons, which due to the build-up effect gives an almost flat dose delivery pattern to the first 4 mm around the stent. The absorbed dose rate is 1.33 Gy/min, 0.25 mm from the stent surface while the dose to normal tissue is in order of 0.22 Gy/min, i.e., a factor of 6 lower. To spare normal tissue further fractionation of the dose is also possible. The capture rate is relatively high at both ends of the foil. The dose distribution from gamma and charge particle radiation at the edges and inside the stent contributes to a nonuniform dose distribution. This will lead to higher doses to the surrounding tissue and may prevent stent edge and in-stent restenosis. The position of the stent can be verified and corrected by the treatment plan prior to activation. Activation of the stent by an external neutron field can be performed days after catherization when the target cells start to proliferate and can be expected to be more radiation sensitive. Another advantage of the nonradioactive gadolinium stent is the possibility to avoid radiation hazard to personnel.