Journal Articles
2021
Morcos, Marc; Antaki, Majd; Viswanathan, Akila N.; Enger, Shirin A.
A novel minimally invasive dynamic-shield, intensity-modulated brachytherapy system for the treatment of cervical cancer Journal Article
In: Medical Physics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2021, ISSN: 2473-4209.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
@article{morcos_novel_2021,
title = {A novel minimally invasive dynamic-shield, intensity-modulated brachytherapy system for the treatment of cervical cancer},
author = {Marc Morcos and Majd Antaki and Akila N. Viswanathan and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1002/mp.14459},
issn = {2473-4209},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
journal = {Medical Physics},
volume = {48},
number = {1},
pages = {71--79},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To present a novel, MRI-compatible dynamicshield intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) applicator and delivery system using 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb radioisotopes for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Needle-free IMBT is a promising technique for improving target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The IMBT delivery system dynamically controls the rotation of a novel tungsten shield placed inside an MRI-compatible, 6-mm wide intrauterine tandem. Using 36 cervical cancer cases, conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC-BT) and intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT) (10Ci 192 Ir) plans were compared to IMBT (10Ci 192 Ir; 11.5Ci 75 Se; 44Ci 169 Yb). All plans were generated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, RapidBrachyMC. Treatment plans were optimized then normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 and the D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in the research brachytherapy planning system, RapidBrachyMCTPS. Plans were renormalized until either of the three OAR reached dose limits to calculate the maximum achievable HR-CTV D90 and D98 . RESULTS: Compared to IC-BT, IMBT with either of the three radionuclides significantly improves the HR-CTV D90 and D98 by up to 5.2% ± 0.3% (P textless 0.001) and 6.7% ± 0.5% (P textless 0.001), respectively, with the largest dosimetric enhancement when using 169 Yb followed by 75 Se and then 192 Ir. Similarly, D2cc for all OAR improved with IMBT by up to 7.7% ± 0.6% (P textless 0.001). For IC/IS-BT cases, needle-free IMBT achieved clinically acceptable plans with 169 Yb-based IMBT further improving HR-CTV D98 by 1.5% ± 0.2% (P = 0.034) and decreasing sigmoid D2cc by 1.9% ± 0.4% (P = 0.048). Delivery times for IMBT are increased by a factor of 1.7, 3.3, and 2.3 for 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb, respectively, relative to conventional 192 Ir BT.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic shield IMBT provides a promising alternative to conventional IC- and IC/IS-BT techniques with significant dosimetric enhancements and even greater improvements with intermediate energy radionuclides. The ability to deliver a highly conformal, OAR-sparing dose without IS needles provides a simplified method for improving the therapeutic ratio less invasively and in a less resource intensive manner.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: To present a novel, MRI-compatible dynamicshield intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) applicator and delivery system using 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb radioisotopes for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Needle-free IMBT is a promising technique for improving target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The IMBT delivery system dynamically controls the rotation of a novel tungsten shield placed inside an MRI-compatible, 6-mm wide intrauterine tandem. Using 36 cervical cancer cases, conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC-BT) and intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT) (10Ci 192 Ir) plans were compared to IMBT (10Ci 192 Ir; 11.5Ci 75 Se; 44Ci 169 Yb). All plans were generated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, RapidBrachyMC. Treatment plans were optimized then normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 and the D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in the research brachytherapy planning system, RapidBrachyMCTPS. Plans were renormalized until either of the three OAR reached dose limits to calculate the maximum achievable HR-CTV D90 and D98 . RESULTS: Compared to IC-BT, IMBT with either of the three radionuclides significantly improves the HR-CTV D90 and D98 by up to 5.2% ± 0.3% (P textless 0.001) and 6.7% ± 0.5% (P textless 0.001), respectively, with the largest dosimetric enhancement when using 169 Yb followed by 75 Se and then 192 Ir. Similarly, D2cc for all OAR improved with IMBT by up to 7.7% ± 0.6% (P textless 0.001). For IC/IS-BT cases, needle-free IMBT achieved clinically acceptable plans with 169 Yb-based IMBT further improving HR-CTV D98 by 1.5% ± 0.2% (P = 0.034) and decreasing sigmoid D2cc by 1.9% ± 0.4% (P = 0.048). Delivery times for IMBT are increased by a factor of 1.7, 3.3, and 2.3 for 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb, respectively, relative to conventional 192 Ir BT.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic shield IMBT provides a promising alternative to conventional IC- and IC/IS-BT techniques with significant dosimetric enhancements and even greater improvements with intermediate energy radionuclides. The ability to deliver a highly conformal, OAR-sparing dose without IS needles provides a simplified method for improving the therapeutic ratio less invasively and in a less resource intensive manner.2020
Mao, Ximeng; Pineau, Joelle; Keyes, Roy; Enger, Shirin A.
RapidBrachyDL: Rapid Radiation Dose Calculations in Brachytherapy Via Deep Learning Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 802–812, 2020, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Colon, Computer, Computer-Assisted, Deep Learning, Female, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo Method, Neural Networks, Organs at Risk, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Rectum, Retrospective Studies, Sigmoid, Urinary Bladder, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
@article{mao_rapidbrachydl_2020,
title = {RapidBrachyDL: Rapid Radiation Dose Calculations in Brachytherapy Via Deep Learning},
author = {Ximeng Mao and Joelle Pineau and Roy Keyes and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.045},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-11-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {108},
number = {3},
pages = {802--812},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Detailed and accurate absorbed dose calculations from radiation interactions with the human body can be obtained with the Monte Carlo (MC) method. However, the MC method can be slow for use in the time-sensitive clinical workflow. The aim of this study was to provide a solution to the accuracy-time trade-off for 192Ir-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy by using deep learning.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: RapidBrachyDL, a 3-dimensional deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, is proposed to predict dose distributions calculated with the MC method given a patient's computed tomography images, contours of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and treatment plan. Sixty-one patients with prostate cancer and 10 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study, with data from 47 patients with prostate cancer being used to train the model.
RESULTS: Compared with ground truth MC simulations, the predicted dose distributions by RapidBrachyDL showed a consistent shape in the dose-volume histograms (DVHs); comparable DVH dosimetric indices including 0.73% difference for prostate CTV D90, 1.1% for rectum D2cc, 1.45% for urethra D0.1cc, and 1.05% for bladder D2cc; and substantially smaller prediction time, acceleration by a factor of 300. RapidBrachyDL also demonstrated good generalization to cervical data with 1.73%, 2.46%, 1.68%, and 1.74% difference for CTV D90, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc, respectively, which was unseen during the training.
CONCLUSION: Deep CNN-based dose estimation is a promising method for patient-specific brachytherapy dosimetry. Desired radiation quantities can be obtained with accuracies arbitrarily close to those of the source MC algorithm, but with much faster computation times. The idea behind deep CNN-based dose estimation can be safely extended to other radiation sources and tumor sites by following a similar training process.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Colon, Computer, Computer-Assisted, Deep Learning, Female, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo Method, Neural Networks, Organs at Risk, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Rectum, Retrospective Studies, Sigmoid, Urinary Bladder, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Detailed and accurate absorbed dose calculations from radiation interactions with the human body can be obtained with the Monte Carlo (MC) method. However, the MC method can be slow for use in the time-sensitive clinical workflow. The aim of this study was to provide a solution to the accuracy-time trade-off for 192Ir-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy by using deep learning.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: RapidBrachyDL, a 3-dimensional deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, is proposed to predict dose distributions calculated with the MC method given a patient’s computed tomography images, contours of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and treatment plan. Sixty-one patients with prostate cancer and 10 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study, with data from 47 patients with prostate cancer being used to train the model.
RESULTS: Compared with ground truth MC simulations, the predicted dose distributions by RapidBrachyDL showed a consistent shape in the dose-volume histograms (DVHs); comparable DVH dosimetric indices including 0.73% difference for prostate CTV D90, 1.1% for rectum D2cc, 1.45% for urethra D0.1cc, and 1.05% for bladder D2cc; and substantially smaller prediction time, acceleration by a factor of 300. RapidBrachyDL also demonstrated good generalization to cervical data with 1.73%, 2.46%, 1.68%, and 1.74% difference for CTV D90, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc, respectively, which was unseen during the training.
CONCLUSION: Deep CNN-based dose estimation is a promising method for patient-specific brachytherapy dosimetry. Desired radiation quantities can be obtained with accuracies arbitrarily close to those of the source MC algorithm, but with much faster computation times. The idea behind deep CNN-based dose estimation can be safely extended to other radiation sources and tumor sites by following a similar training process.2019
Shoemaker, Tristan; Vuong, Té; Glickman, Harry; Kaifi, Samar; Famulari, Gabriel; Enger, Shirin A.
Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 875–883, 2019, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium
@article{shoemaker_dosimetric_2019,
title = {Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy},
author = {Tristan Shoemaker and Té Vuong and Harry Glickman and Samar Kaifi and Gabriel Famulari and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.003},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-11-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {105},
number = {4},
pages = {875--883},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.2018
Mann-Krzisnik, Dylan; Verhaegen, Frank; Enger, Shirin A.
The influence of tissue composition uncertainty on dose distributions in brachytherapy Journal Article
In: Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 394–410, 2018, ISSN: 1879-0887.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Algorithms, Body Composition, Brachytherapy, Elemental composition, Humans, Mass energy-absorption coefficient, MBDCA, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Review, Tissue heterogeneity, Uncertainty
@article{mann-krzisnik_influence_2018,
title = {The influence of tissue composition uncertainty on dose distributions in brachytherapy},
author = {Dylan Mann-Krzisnik and Frank Verhaegen and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.007},
issn = {1879-0887},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-01},
journal = {Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology},
volume = {126},
number = {3},
pages = {394--410},
abstract = {BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have evolved from serving as a research tool into clinical practice in brachytherapy. This study investigates primary sources of tissue elemental compositions used as input to MBDCAs and the impact of their variability on MBDCA-based dosimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved through PubMed. Minimum dose delivered to 90% of the target (D90), minimum dose delivered to the hottest specified volume for organs at risk (OAR) and mass energy-absorption coefficients (μen/ρ) generated by using EGSnrc "g" user-code were compared to assess the impact of compositional variability.
RESULTS: Elemental composition for hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen are derived from the gross contents of fats, proteins and carbohydrates for any given tissue, the compositions of which are taken from literature dating back to 1940-1950. Heavier elements are derived from studies performed in the 1950-1960. Variability in elemental composition impacts greatly D90 for target tissues and doses to OAR for brachytherapy with low energy sources and less for 192Ir-based brachytherapy. Discrepancies in μen/ρ are also indicative of dose differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Updated elemental compositions are needed to optimize MBDCA-based dosimetry. Until then, tissue compositions based on gross simplifications in early studies will dominate the uncertainties in tissue heterogeneity.},
keywords = {Algorithms, Body Composition, Brachytherapy, Elemental composition, Humans, Mass energy-absorption coefficient, MBDCA, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Review, Tissue heterogeneity, Uncertainty},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have evolved from serving as a research tool into clinical practice in brachytherapy. This study investigates primary sources of tissue elemental compositions used as input to MBDCAs and the impact of their variability on MBDCA-based dosimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved through PubMed. Minimum dose delivered to 90% of the target (D90), minimum dose delivered to the hottest specified volume for organs at risk (OAR) and mass energy-absorption coefficients (μen/ρ) generated by using EGSnrc “g” user-code were compared to assess the impact of compositional variability.
RESULTS: Elemental composition for hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen are derived from the gross contents of fats, proteins and carbohydrates for any given tissue, the compositions of which are taken from literature dating back to 1940-1950. Heavier elements are derived from studies performed in the 1950-1960. Variability in elemental composition impacts greatly D90 for target tissues and doses to OAR for brachytherapy with low energy sources and less for 192Ir-based brachytherapy. Discrepancies in μen/ρ are also indicative of dose differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Updated elemental compositions are needed to optimize MBDCA-based dosimetry. Until then, tissue compositions based on gross simplifications in early studies will dominate the uncertainties in tissue heterogeneity.
Journal Articles
2021
Morcos, Marc; Antaki, Majd; Viswanathan, Akila N.; Enger, Shirin A.
A novel minimally invasive dynamic-shield, intensity-modulated brachytherapy system for the treatment of cervical cancer Journal Article
In: Medical Physics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2021, ISSN: 2473-4209.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
@article{morcos_novel_2021,
title = {A novel minimally invasive dynamic-shield, intensity-modulated brachytherapy system for the treatment of cervical cancer},
author = {Marc Morcos and Majd Antaki and Akila N. Viswanathan and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1002/mp.14459},
issn = {2473-4209},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
journal = {Medical Physics},
volume = {48},
number = {1},
pages = {71--79},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To present a novel, MRI-compatible dynamicshield intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) applicator and delivery system using 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb radioisotopes for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Needle-free IMBT is a promising technique for improving target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The IMBT delivery system dynamically controls the rotation of a novel tungsten shield placed inside an MRI-compatible, 6-mm wide intrauterine tandem. Using 36 cervical cancer cases, conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC-BT) and intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT) (10Ci 192 Ir) plans were compared to IMBT (10Ci 192 Ir; 11.5Ci 75 Se; 44Ci 169 Yb). All plans were generated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, RapidBrachyMC. Treatment plans were optimized then normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 and the D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in the research brachytherapy planning system, RapidBrachyMCTPS. Plans were renormalized until either of the three OAR reached dose limits to calculate the maximum achievable HR-CTV D90 and D98 . RESULTS: Compared to IC-BT, IMBT with either of the three radionuclides significantly improves the HR-CTV D90 and D98 by up to 5.2% ± 0.3% (P textless 0.001) and 6.7% ± 0.5% (P textless 0.001), respectively, with the largest dosimetric enhancement when using 169 Yb followed by 75 Se and then 192 Ir. Similarly, D2cc for all OAR improved with IMBT by up to 7.7% ± 0.6% (P textless 0.001). For IC/IS-BT cases, needle-free IMBT achieved clinically acceptable plans with 169 Yb-based IMBT further improving HR-CTV D98 by 1.5% ± 0.2% (P = 0.034) and decreasing sigmoid D2cc by 1.9% ± 0.4% (P = 0.048). Delivery times for IMBT are increased by a factor of 1.7, 3.3, and 2.3 for 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb, respectively, relative to conventional 192 Ir BT.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic shield IMBT provides a promising alternative to conventional IC- and IC/IS-BT techniques with significant dosimetric enhancements and even greater improvements with intermediate energy radionuclides. The ability to deliver a highly conformal, OAR-sparing dose without IS needles provides a simplified method for improving the therapeutic ratio less invasively and in a less resource intensive manner.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Image-guided cervix brachytherapy, Intensity modulated brachytherapy, Monte Carlo based dosimetry, Monte Carlo Method, MRI-guided GYN brachytherapy, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: To present a novel, MRI-compatible dynamicshield intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) applicator and delivery system using 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb radioisotopes for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Needle-free IMBT is a promising technique for improving target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The IMBT delivery system dynamically controls the rotation of a novel tungsten shield placed inside an MRI-compatible, 6-mm wide intrauterine tandem. Using 36 cervical cancer cases, conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC-BT) and intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT) (10Ci 192 Ir) plans were compared to IMBT (10Ci 192 Ir; 11.5Ci 75 Se; 44Ci 169 Yb). All plans were generated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, RapidBrachyMC. Treatment plans were optimized then normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 and the D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in the research brachytherapy planning system, RapidBrachyMCTPS. Plans were renormalized until either of the three OAR reached dose limits to calculate the maximum achievable HR-CTV D90 and D98 . RESULTS: Compared to IC-BT, IMBT with either of the three radionuclides significantly improves the HR-CTV D90 and D98 by up to 5.2% ± 0.3% (P textless 0.001) and 6.7% ± 0.5% (P textless 0.001), respectively, with the largest dosimetric enhancement when using 169 Yb followed by 75 Se and then 192 Ir. Similarly, D2cc for all OAR improved with IMBT by up to 7.7% ± 0.6% (P textless 0.001). For IC/IS-BT cases, needle-free IMBT achieved clinically acceptable plans with 169 Yb-based IMBT further improving HR-CTV D98 by 1.5% ± 0.2% (P = 0.034) and decreasing sigmoid D2cc by 1.9% ± 0.4% (P = 0.048). Delivery times for IMBT are increased by a factor of 1.7, 3.3, and 2.3 for 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb, respectively, relative to conventional 192 Ir BT.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic shield IMBT provides a promising alternative to conventional IC- and IC/IS-BT techniques with significant dosimetric enhancements and even greater improvements with intermediate energy radionuclides. The ability to deliver a highly conformal, OAR-sparing dose without IS needles provides a simplified method for improving the therapeutic ratio less invasively and in a less resource intensive manner.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The IMBT delivery system dynamically controls the rotation of a novel tungsten shield placed inside an MRI-compatible, 6-mm wide intrauterine tandem. Using 36 cervical cancer cases, conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC-BT) and intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT) (10Ci 192 Ir) plans were compared to IMBT (10Ci 192 Ir; 11.5Ci 75 Se; 44Ci 169 Yb). All plans were generated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, RapidBrachyMC. Treatment plans were optimized then normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 and the D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in the research brachytherapy planning system, RapidBrachyMCTPS. Plans were renormalized until either of the three OAR reached dose limits to calculate the maximum achievable HR-CTV D90 and D98 . RESULTS: Compared to IC-BT, IMBT with either of the three radionuclides significantly improves the HR-CTV D90 and D98 by up to 5.2% ± 0.3% (P textless 0.001) and 6.7% ± 0.5% (P textless 0.001), respectively, with the largest dosimetric enhancement when using 169 Yb followed by 75 Se and then 192 Ir. Similarly, D2cc for all OAR improved with IMBT by up to 7.7% ± 0.6% (P textless 0.001). For IC/IS-BT cases, needle-free IMBT achieved clinically acceptable plans with 169 Yb-based IMBT further improving HR-CTV D98 by 1.5% ± 0.2% (P = 0.034) and decreasing sigmoid D2cc by 1.9% ± 0.4% (P = 0.048). Delivery times for IMBT are increased by a factor of 1.7, 3.3, and 2.3 for 192 Ir, 75 Se, and 169 Yb, respectively, relative to conventional 192 Ir BT.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic shield IMBT provides a promising alternative to conventional IC- and IC/IS-BT techniques with significant dosimetric enhancements and even greater improvements with intermediate energy radionuclides. The ability to deliver a highly conformal, OAR-sparing dose without IS needles provides a simplified method for improving the therapeutic ratio less invasively and in a less resource intensive manner.
2020
Mao, Ximeng; Pineau, Joelle; Keyes, Roy; Enger, Shirin A.
RapidBrachyDL: Rapid Radiation Dose Calculations in Brachytherapy Via Deep Learning Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 802–812, 2020, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Colon, Computer, Computer-Assisted, Deep Learning, Female, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo Method, Neural Networks, Organs at Risk, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Rectum, Retrospective Studies, Sigmoid, Urinary Bladder, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
@article{mao_rapidbrachydl_2020,
title = {RapidBrachyDL: Rapid Radiation Dose Calculations in Brachytherapy Via Deep Learning},
author = {Ximeng Mao and Joelle Pineau and Roy Keyes and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.045},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-11-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {108},
number = {3},
pages = {802--812},
abstract = {PURPOSE: Detailed and accurate absorbed dose calculations from radiation interactions with the human body can be obtained with the Monte Carlo (MC) method. However, the MC method can be slow for use in the time-sensitive clinical workflow. The aim of this study was to provide a solution to the accuracy-time trade-off for 192Ir-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy by using deep learning.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: RapidBrachyDL, a 3-dimensional deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, is proposed to predict dose distributions calculated with the MC method given a patient's computed tomography images, contours of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and treatment plan. Sixty-one patients with prostate cancer and 10 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study, with data from 47 patients with prostate cancer being used to train the model.
RESULTS: Compared with ground truth MC simulations, the predicted dose distributions by RapidBrachyDL showed a consistent shape in the dose-volume histograms (DVHs); comparable DVH dosimetric indices including 0.73% difference for prostate CTV D90, 1.1% for rectum D2cc, 1.45% for urethra D0.1cc, and 1.05% for bladder D2cc; and substantially smaller prediction time, acceleration by a factor of 300. RapidBrachyDL also demonstrated good generalization to cervical data with 1.73%, 2.46%, 1.68%, and 1.74% difference for CTV D90, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc, respectively, which was unseen during the training.
CONCLUSION: Deep CNN-based dose estimation is a promising method for patient-specific brachytherapy dosimetry. Desired radiation quantities can be obtained with accuracies arbitrarily close to those of the source MC algorithm, but with much faster computation times. The idea behind deep CNN-based dose estimation can be safely extended to other radiation sources and tumor sites by following a similar training process.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Colon, Computer, Computer-Assisted, Deep Learning, Female, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Male, Monte Carlo Method, Neural Networks, Organs at Risk, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Rectum, Retrospective Studies, Sigmoid, Urinary Bladder, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: Detailed and accurate absorbed dose calculations from radiation interactions with the human body can be obtained with the Monte Carlo (MC) method. However, the MC method can be slow for use in the time-sensitive clinical workflow. The aim of this study was to provide a solution to the accuracy-time trade-off for 192Ir-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy by using deep learning.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: RapidBrachyDL, a 3-dimensional deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, is proposed to predict dose distributions calculated with the MC method given a patient’s computed tomography images, contours of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and treatment plan. Sixty-one patients with prostate cancer and 10 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study, with data from 47 patients with prostate cancer being used to train the model.
RESULTS: Compared with ground truth MC simulations, the predicted dose distributions by RapidBrachyDL showed a consistent shape in the dose-volume histograms (DVHs); comparable DVH dosimetric indices including 0.73% difference for prostate CTV D90, 1.1% for rectum D2cc, 1.45% for urethra D0.1cc, and 1.05% for bladder D2cc; and substantially smaller prediction time, acceleration by a factor of 300. RapidBrachyDL also demonstrated good generalization to cervical data with 1.73%, 2.46%, 1.68%, and 1.74% difference for CTV D90, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc, respectively, which was unseen during the training.
CONCLUSION: Deep CNN-based dose estimation is a promising method for patient-specific brachytherapy dosimetry. Desired radiation quantities can be obtained with accuracies arbitrarily close to those of the source MC algorithm, but with much faster computation times. The idea behind deep CNN-based dose estimation can be safely extended to other radiation sources and tumor sites by following a similar training process.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: RapidBrachyDL, a 3-dimensional deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, is proposed to predict dose distributions calculated with the MC method given a patient’s computed tomography images, contours of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and treatment plan. Sixty-one patients with prostate cancer and 10 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study, with data from 47 patients with prostate cancer being used to train the model.
RESULTS: Compared with ground truth MC simulations, the predicted dose distributions by RapidBrachyDL showed a consistent shape in the dose-volume histograms (DVHs); comparable DVH dosimetric indices including 0.73% difference for prostate CTV D90, 1.1% for rectum D2cc, 1.45% for urethra D0.1cc, and 1.05% for bladder D2cc; and substantially smaller prediction time, acceleration by a factor of 300. RapidBrachyDL also demonstrated good generalization to cervical data with 1.73%, 2.46%, 1.68%, and 1.74% difference for CTV D90, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc, respectively, which was unseen during the training.
CONCLUSION: Deep CNN-based dose estimation is a promising method for patient-specific brachytherapy dosimetry. Desired radiation quantities can be obtained with accuracies arbitrarily close to those of the source MC algorithm, but with much faster computation times. The idea behind deep CNN-based dose estimation can be safely extended to other radiation sources and tumor sites by following a similar training process.
2019
Shoemaker, Tristan; Vuong, Té; Glickman, Harry; Kaifi, Samar; Famulari, Gabriel; Enger, Shirin A.
Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy Journal Article
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 875–883, 2019, ISSN: 1879-355X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium
@article{shoemaker_dosimetric_2019,
title = {Dosimetric Considerations for Ytterbium-169, Selenium-75, and Iridium-192 Radioisotopes in High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy},
author = {Tristan Shoemaker and Té Vuong and Harry Glickman and Samar Kaifi and Gabriel Famulari and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.003},
issn = {1879-355X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-11-01},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics},
volume = {105},
number = {4},
pages = {875--883},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.},
keywords = {Brachytherapy, Femur, Humans, Iridium Radioisotopes, Monte Carlo Method, Organs at Risk, Pelvic Bones, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectum, Selenium Radioisotopes, Tomography, Urinary Bladder, X-Ray Computed, Ytterbium},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
PURPOSE: To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. RESULTS: In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43-based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50.
CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.
2018
Mann-Krzisnik, Dylan; Verhaegen, Frank; Enger, Shirin A.
The influence of tissue composition uncertainty on dose distributions in brachytherapy Journal Article
In: Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 394–410, 2018, ISSN: 1879-0887.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Algorithms, Body Composition, Brachytherapy, Elemental composition, Humans, Mass energy-absorption coefficient, MBDCA, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Review, Tissue heterogeneity, Uncertainty
@article{mann-krzisnik_influence_2018,
title = {The influence of tissue composition uncertainty on dose distributions in brachytherapy},
author = {Dylan Mann-Krzisnik and Frank Verhaegen and Shirin A. Enger},
doi = {10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.007},
issn = {1879-0887},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-01},
journal = {Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology},
volume = {126},
number = {3},
pages = {394--410},
abstract = {BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have evolved from serving as a research tool into clinical practice in brachytherapy. This study investigates primary sources of tissue elemental compositions used as input to MBDCAs and the impact of their variability on MBDCA-based dosimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved through PubMed. Minimum dose delivered to 90% of the target (D90), minimum dose delivered to the hottest specified volume for organs at risk (OAR) and mass energy-absorption coefficients (μen/ρ) generated by using EGSnrc "g" user-code were compared to assess the impact of compositional variability.
RESULTS: Elemental composition for hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen are derived from the gross contents of fats, proteins and carbohydrates for any given tissue, the compositions of which are taken from literature dating back to 1940-1950. Heavier elements are derived from studies performed in the 1950-1960. Variability in elemental composition impacts greatly D90 for target tissues and doses to OAR for brachytherapy with low energy sources and less for 192Ir-based brachytherapy. Discrepancies in μen/ρ are also indicative of dose differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Updated elemental compositions are needed to optimize MBDCA-based dosimetry. Until then, tissue compositions based on gross simplifications in early studies will dominate the uncertainties in tissue heterogeneity.},
keywords = {Algorithms, Body Composition, Brachytherapy, Elemental composition, Humans, Mass energy-absorption coefficient, MBDCA, Organs at Risk, Radiotherapy Dosage, Review, Tissue heterogeneity, Uncertainty},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have evolved from serving as a research tool into clinical practice in brachytherapy. This study investigates primary sources of tissue elemental compositions used as input to MBDCAs and the impact of their variability on MBDCA-based dosimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved through PubMed. Minimum dose delivered to 90% of the target (D90), minimum dose delivered to the hottest specified volume for organs at risk (OAR) and mass energy-absorption coefficients (μen/ρ) generated by using EGSnrc “g” user-code were compared to assess the impact of compositional variability.
RESULTS: Elemental composition for hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen are derived from the gross contents of fats, proteins and carbohydrates for any given tissue, the compositions of which are taken from literature dating back to 1940-1950. Heavier elements are derived from studies performed in the 1950-1960. Variability in elemental composition impacts greatly D90 for target tissues and doses to OAR for brachytherapy with low energy sources and less for 192Ir-based brachytherapy. Discrepancies in μen/ρ are also indicative of dose differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Updated elemental compositions are needed to optimize MBDCA-based dosimetry. Until then, tissue compositions based on gross simplifications in early studies will dominate the uncertainties in tissue heterogeneity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved through PubMed. Minimum dose delivered to 90% of the target (D90), minimum dose delivered to the hottest specified volume for organs at risk (OAR) and mass energy-absorption coefficients (μen/ρ) generated by using EGSnrc “g” user-code were compared to assess the impact of compositional variability.
RESULTS: Elemental composition for hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen are derived from the gross contents of fats, proteins and carbohydrates for any given tissue, the compositions of which are taken from literature dating back to 1940-1950. Heavier elements are derived from studies performed in the 1950-1960. Variability in elemental composition impacts greatly D90 for target tissues and doses to OAR for brachytherapy with low energy sources and less for 192Ir-based brachytherapy. Discrepancies in μen/ρ are also indicative of dose differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Updated elemental compositions are needed to optimize MBDCA-based dosimetry. Until then, tissue compositions based on gross simplifications in early studies will dominate the uncertainties in tissue heterogeneity.